Actively Validated Services

Actively Validated Services (AVSs) are the protocols that restaked ETH actually secures. Each AVS outsources its validation to EigenLayer's operator network — paying for borrowed security instead of bootstrapping a new validator set. As of 2025, 20+ AVSs are secured by $15B+ in restaked ETH.

AVS Ecosystem — Live View

● Node size = relative TVL secured ● Color = AVS category ● Hover for details ● Click to focus

Types of AVSs

📦
Medium Risk
Data Availability
EigenDA, Avail

DA layers provide rollups with inexpensive data availability. Restaked ETH secures the data availability sampling (DAS) network — if operators withhold data, they get slashed.

Slash Conditions
Data withholding attacks trigger 1–10 ETH per occurrence. Correlated failures across sampling nodes can result in larger deductions.
🌉
High Risk
Cross-chain Bridges
LayerZero, Wormhole (v2)

Bridges verify cross-chain messages and must detect fraudulent state transitions. Restaked ETH serves as the security budget for message verification. If a bridge validator confirms a fraudulent tx, slashing fires.

Slash Conditions
Confirmation of fraudulent cross-chain messages — minimum 5 ETH, potentially your entire position if the fraud amount exceeds your stake.
🔮
Medium Risk
Oracle Networks
Chainlink (CCIP), Redstone

Oracles aggregate off-chain data and post it on-chain. Restaked ETH secures the oracle validator set — if an oracle reports prices that deviate beyond allowed bounds, slashing applies.

Slash Conditions
Price data staleness or deviation beyond threshold — typically 1–3 ETH per incident. Cascading oracle failures can trigger correlated slashing.
📜
Medium-High Risk
Rollup Sequencer
AltLayer, Radius

Restaked ETH secures decentralized sequencers — entities that order and batch rollup transactions. If a sequencer reorgs the rollup or censors transactions, slashing fires.

Slash Conditions
Sequencer reorgs or censorship — minimum 1 ETH, up to full stake if the reorg causes user losses exceeding your bonded amount.
⚙️
Medium Risk
ZK Coprocessors
Lagrange, Risc Zero

ZK coprocessors generate zero-knowledge proofs of off-chain computations. Operators must submit valid proofs on time — if a proof is missing or invalid, slashing applies.

Slash Conditions
Missed proof submission windows or invalid proofs — typically 0.5–2 ETH per incident. Proof generation failures that delay finality trigger additional penalties.
🤖
Low-Medium Risk
Keeper Networks
Keep3r, Gelato

Automated task executors that trigger on-chain events (liquidations, arbitrage, Keeper rewards). Restaked ETH secures the Keeper network — failed task execution due to downtime triggers slashing.

Slash Conditions
Downtime or failed task execution — 0.1–1 ETH per missed task. Repeated failures compound the penalty.

🎚️ AVS Risk Tier Simulator

Choose your AVS risk profile to see how expected yield and slashing probability change. Use the slider to mix your exposure across risk tiers.

Additional AVS APY
+1.5%
Slash Probability
~0.5%/yr
Net Yield Impact
~4.7% APY
Risk-Adjusted Score
★★★☆☆

Risk score = (Additional APY) / (Slash Probability × estimated slash size). Higher is better. This is a simplified model — actual slashing depends on operator behavior, AVS-specific conditions, and correlated failures.

📊 AVS Reward Economics by Category

Each AVS type offers a different risk/reward profile. The chart below shows typical AVS reward rates, slashing probabilities, and resulting net yield for each category.

AVS Category Examples AVS Reward Slash Prob/yr Net Yield Added
Low Risk AVS Keeper networks, ZK coprocessors 0.5–1% 0.1%/yr 3.3–3.8%
Medium Risk AVS DA layers, oracle networks 1–2% 0.5%/yr 3.7–5%
High Risk AVS Bridges, cross-chain messaging 2–4% 1–2%/yr 4–7%
Mixed Portfolio Operator runs 5+ AVS types 1.5–3% 0.7%/yr 4.5–6.5%

Key AVSs in the Ecosystem

EigenDA

Data availability for rollups via DAS. Operators sample data shards and must stay available.

TVL: $8B+ Risk: Medium
Omni Network

Cross-rollup messaging and interoperability layer. Handles tx relaying across L2s.

TVL: $2B+ Risk: Medium
AltLayer

Decentralized rollup sequencer with restaked security. Flagship use of EigenLayer's DSS.

TVL: $1B+ Risk: Medium-High
Lagrange

ZK coprocessor that generates fraud proofs for arbitrary off-chain computations.

TVL: $500M+ Risk: Medium
Brevis

ZK data attestation — proves historical on-chain data was valid without re-executing.

TVL: $400M+ Risk: Medium
Witness Chain

DePIN verification — confirms physical world sensor data and device participation on-chain.

TVL: $300M+ Risk: Low-Medium

👀 How to Evaluate an Operator's AVS Portfolio

Since you don't directly choose which AVSs your ETH secures, evaluating your operator's AVS portfolio is one of the most important risk management steps in restaking. Here's what to look at:

Uptime Track Record
High

Historical validator uptime — downtime is a primary slashing vector. Look for 99.9%+ historical uptime.

AVS Coverage
Medium

How many AVSs the operator runs — diversification is good for you but raises their correlated risk.

Geographic Distribution
Medium

Operators spread across regions to avoid geographic single points of failure.

Slash History
High

Any historical slashing incidents and how they were resolved. Steer clear of repeated offenders.

Commission Rate
Low

What percentage of your AVS rewards the operator takes. Typical range: 5–20%.

Insurance / Bonding
Medium

Whether operator has additional自有 bond beyond restaked delegations — skin in the game reduces risk.

⚡ How a Slash Reaches Your Delegated ETH

Understanding the slashing chain is essential to AVS risk. Here is the complete flow from AVS fault detection to your ETH being burned:

Who gets slashed first?

The operator's own bonded ETH is slashed first — before any delegators. Operators typically maintain 5–10% of their total stake as自有 capital. If the operator's自有 bond is insufficient to cover the full slash, delegators absorb the remainder proportionally.

Can the slash be vetoed?

Yes — EigenLayer has a 7-day fraud-proof window and a Security Council veto committee. If an AVS fires a slash that looks erroneous or malicious, the Council can cancel it within 7 days. However, this is an emergency backstop, not a reliable shield — do not rely on it for regular risk management.

💰 Where Your AVS Yield Actually Comes From

AVS rewards are funded through several mechanisms depending on the AVS's business model:

  • Protocol treasury — AVS uses its own token treasury to pay operators (AltLayer, Omni)
  • User fees — Rollup sequencer fees fund restaking rewards (AltLayer's sequencer revenue)
  • Data availability fees — Rollups pay DA providers who pay restakers (EigenDA)
  • Bridged asset yield — Cross-chain bridges use bridging fees to pay restakers
Reward Distribution Flow
AVS Treasury / Fees Source
↓ RewardsCoordinator Smart contract
↓ Operator cut (5–20%) Commission
↓ Restaker share Your earnings
Active AVSs
20+
Total Secured
$15B+
AVS Reward Range
0.5–4%
Slash Probability
0.1–2%/yr

⚠️ Understand the slashing risk first

Before delegating to any operator, understand exactly what can go wrong and how slashes propagate to your ETH.

Slashing & Risk →

💸 Operator economics

See how operators earn, what they charge, and how to calculate whether a particular operator's commission is fair.

Operator Economics →

🔄 Back to restaking overview

Understand the full restaking picture — how it works, the protocols, the yield, and the risks.

Restaking Overview →