What Is Restaking?

Restaking lets you stake the same ETH across multiple protocols simultaneously — earning yield at every layer while your capital stays in one place. EigenLayer pioneered the concept in 2023; by 2025 it held $15B+ in restaked ETH securing 20+ external services.

ETH Staking → Restaking Flow

● Each particle = ETH flowing to earn yield ● Color = protocol layer (ETH → LST → Restaking → AVS) ● Y-axis = accumulated yield

How Restaking Works

Restaking works by pledging already-staked ETH (or liquid staking tokens) as additional collateral for external protocols called Actively Validated Services (AVS). Here is the chain:

  1. Stake ETH — Deposit to Ethereum validators directly, or via a liquid staking protocol (Lido, Rocket Pool) to receive stETH or rETH.
  2. Deposit into restaking protocol — Submit your ETH or LST to EigenLayer (or Symbiotic/Karak). Your stake is now restaked.
  3. Delegate to an operator — Operators are professional node runners who opt into AVS on your behalf.
  4. Earn layered rewards — Receive base staking APY plus restaking rewards from each AVS the operator secures.

Restaking vs Traditional Staking

In traditional staking, your ETH is doing one job: securing Ethereum's proof-of-stake consensus. You deposit 32 ETH to a validator, that validator signs blocks, attestations, and sync committees, and you earn ~3.2–3.5% APY from protocol inflation. Your ETH sits in the deposit contract for months or years. When you want to exit, you join a validator exit queue and wait days or weeks.

Restaking takes the same ETH and puts it to work in a second job simultaneously. Your staked ETH's economic weight — the billions of dollars securing Ethereum — now also secures other protocols. Those protocols pay you a fee for borrowing your security. Your ETH doesn't work harder; it works broader.

Traditional Staking
• ETH validates one chain
• ~3.2–3.5% APY
• Slashing only from consensus faults
• 7-day+ exit queue
• Single trust assumption (Ethereum)
Restaking
• ETH validates multiple chains/AVSs
• ~4–7% APY (base + AVS rewards)
• Slashing from consensus + every AVS
• 7-day escrow on withdrawals
• Trust assumptions: Ethereum + operator + each AVS

The Double Duty: ETH at Two Jobs at Once

The clever insight behind restaking is that the same ETH can simultaneously satisfy two different security models without any conflict:

⛓️
PoS Consensus
Your ETH secures Ethereum's beacon chain. Validators sign blocks, attestations, and sync committees. This is ETH's day job — the baseline yield from protocol inflation.
🔄
AVS Validation
Your ETH simultaneously backs Actively Validated Services — EigenDA, Omni, AltLayer, Lagrange, and others. Operators use your delegated stake to provide these services, and you earn a cut of their fees.

Neither role conflicts with the other. Your validator continues earning base ETH yield while simultaneously providing economic security to AVSs through EigenLayer's delegation model. The only additional risk: if an operator you delegated to misbehaves in an AVS, you get slashed too — even though you didn't choose that AVS or even know about it.

📊 TVL Comparison: All Restaking Protocols

Restaking TVL has grown from near zero in early 2024 to over $19B by mid-2025, driven primarily by EigenLayer and its growing AVS ecosystem. Below is a historical comparison of TVL across the major restaking protocols:

EigenLayer
Symbiotic
Karak
Stader
Saruman
p2p.org

Note: EigenLayer dominates the restaking ecosystem, holding ~80% of total restaking TVL. Symbiotic and Karak are the next largest but still represent less than 15% combined. TVL figures are approximate and based on publicly reported data through Q1 2025.

🏆 Top Restaking Operators

Operators are professional infrastructure providers who run validator nodes and opt into AVS on behalf of delegators. The top operators manage hundreds of thousands of ETH and secure most of the AVS ecosystem:

Operator ETH Delegated Commission AVSs Secured Est. APR TVL Share
Labyrinth
312,000 8% 14 6.2% 8.2%
Staked
285,000 7% 12 5.9% 7.5%
Figment
198,000 9% 10 5.7% 5.2%
P2P.org
176,000 6% 11 5.5% 4.6%
RockawayX
142,000 10% 9 5.8% 3.7%
Everstake
128,000 7% 13 6.0% 3.4%
Staking Facilities
95,000 8% 8 5.4% 2.5%
Chorus One
88,000 9% 7 5.1% 2.3%

Data based on on-chain delegation data and operator-reported figures as of Q1 2025. Commission rates vary by operator and AVS configuration. APR estimates include base staking yield (~3.2%) plus AVS rewards after commission.

All Restaking Protocols

EigenLayer
TVL
$15B+
Operators
300+
AVSs
20+

The original restaking protocol. Pioneer of the restaking primitive. Native + LST restaking.

Symbiotic
TVL
$2B+
Operators
50+
AVSs
8+

A flexible, permissionless restaking primitive. Multi-collateral support beyond just ETH.

Karak
TVL
$1B+
Operators
30+
AVSs
5+

Multi-chain restaking network across Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Blast. Focuses on cross-chain DSS.

Stader
TVL
$800M+
Operators
20+
AVSs
6+

Multi-token staking and restaking platform. ETHx as their restaking token.

Saruman
TVL
$400M+
Operators
15+
AVSs
4+

Decentralized restaking with a focus on verifier neutrality and anti-censorship.

p2p.org
TVL
$300M+
Operators
18+
AVSs
3+

Professional staking infrastructure provider offering restaking as an extension of their node operations.

⚠️ Slashing Risk: The Hidden Catch

Restaking's most important risk is also the most subtle: you don't choose which AVSs your operator runs. When you delegate to an operator, you authorize them to opt into any AVS they want. If that operator runs a buggy or malicious AVS software and gets slashed, your ETH is at risk too — even if the AVS was something you'd never heard of.

The slashing chain looks like this:

Operator misbehavior AVS slash triggered Operator's stake burned Delegators' shares slashed
What triggers a slash?
  • Double-signing (signing two blocks at same height)
  • Invalid state root submission to an AVS
  • Missing attestation duty windows
  • AVS-specific rules (e.g., data unavailability)
  • Smart contract bugs in the AVS itself
How much can you lose?
  • Minimum slash: 1 ETH (for attestation failures)
  • Maximum slash: your entire restaked position
  • Correlated slash: one operator, multiple AVSs = compounding loss
  • EigenLayer caps total slash at restaked position value

⏳ The Withdrawal Queue: 7–14 Days

Unlike regular ETH staking where the exit queue is the only delay, restaking adds an extra layer: EigenLayer enforces a 7-day withdrawal escrow on all restaked positions. When you call queueWithdrawal on the DelegationManager, your ETH is locked for 7 days. During this window, any attributable fault on your operator can still trigger a slash against your position.

Fastest Exit
7 days
LST restaking (no validator exit needed)
Typical Exit
10–14 days
Native restaking (7-day escrow + beacon exit queue)
Slowest Exit
2–3 weeks
Heavy beacon exit queue congestion

ETH Liquid Staking Tokens vs Liquid Restaking Tokens

The DeFi ecosystem has two overlapping families of ETH wrappers. It's important to understand the difference:

Token Type Examples Backed By Earn Slashing Risk
LST (Liquid Staking) stETH, rETH, cbETH, ankrETH ETH staked on beacon chain Base staking ~3.2% Consensus only (rare)
LRT (Liquid Restaking) eETH, ezETH, pufETH, rsETH ETH staked + restaked on AVSs Base + AVS rewards ~4–7% Consensus + all AVS

The key insight: every LRT is built on top of an LST. When you deposit into EtherFi, your ETH goes into Lido's stETH vault, which is then restaked via EigenLayer. So LRTs inherit all the risk of LSTs (validator slashing, smart contract risk at the LST layer) PLUS the additional restaking risk.

All LSTs (stETH, rETH, etc.) are whitelisted for restaking by EigenLayer governance. So if you hold stETH, someone (your LRT protocol or directly via StrategyManager) can restake it without your explicit action. Always check whether your LST provider automatically restakes your tokens.

📈 Restaking Yield Simulator

Adjust the sliders to see how restaking yield changes as more capital enters the system.

Base Staking Yield
1.09 ETH/yr
AVS Restaking Yield
0.32 ETH/yr
Total Annual Yield
1.41 ETH/yr
Effective APY
4.4%

Note: As more capital enters restaking, AVS reward rates compress (supply of restaked ETH increases faster than AVS demand). This is a simplified model — actual yields fluctuate based on operator performance, AVS reward schedules, and EigenLayer policy changes.

🔍 Restaking Protocol Feature Comparison

Protocol Native Restaking LST Restaking Multi-Asset Multi-Chain AVS Count Withdrawal
EigenLayer ETH only Ethereum 20+ 7-day esc.
Symbiotic ✓ Multi Ethereum 8+ Variable
Karak ✓ Multi ✓ 3 chains 5+ Variable
Stader ETHx Multi-chain 6+ 7-day esc.

Benefits

  • Higher total yield — stack restaking rewards on top of base staking APY
  • Capital efficiency — same ETH doing multiple jobs simultaneously
  • Bootstraps new protocol security without diluting new token supply
  • Liquid restaking tokens (LRTs) keep deposits somewhat liquid
  • EigenLayer's Security Council provides slashing veto safety net
  • AVS ecosystem grows the utility and demand for ETH itself

Risks

  • Compounding smart contract risk across multiple protocol layers
  • Slashing from multiple AVS can stack — one operator fault, multiple penalties
  • Withdrawal delays: EigenLayer enforces a 7-day escrow on withdrawals
  • Operator risk — you are trusting your chosen operator's uptime and integrity
  • Complexity obscures actual risk exposure
  • Correlated slashing: if one operator runs 10 AVSs and fails, all get hit simultaneously
EigenLayer TVL
$15B+
Active AVS
20+
Est. Total APY
4–7%
Withdrawal Delay
7 days
Operators
300+

Start Restaking

Start restaking on EigenLayer → Get stETH on Lido → Explore Symbiotic →

Affiliate links — we may earn a referral fee at no cost to you. Always verify contract addresses independently.

Dive deeper into AVSs

Actively Validated Services are the protocols restaked ETH actually secures. Each AVS defines its own task types, slashing conditions, and reward distribution. Understanding AVSs is key to understanding what your ETH is actually doing when it's restaked.

AVS Deep Dive → Slashing Risks → Operator Economics →

Frequently Asked Questions