Governance & Proposals
UNI governance controls every aspect of the Uniswap protocol: protocol fee toggles, treasury allocations, grant distributions, and the V4 hook ecosystem. Understanding the governance process helps you participate or evaluate how Uniswap will evolve.
🗳️ Governance Process — Step by Step
🏛️ Treasury Wallet & Allocations
The Uniswap DAO treasury holds both UNI tokens and ETH/USDC from protocol fees. Governance votes on allocation every quarter. Major allocations as of 2026:
🔑 Key Voting Metrics
📜 Notable AIPs & Their Outcomes
| AIP | Title | Outcome | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIP-1 | Initialize protocol fee switch | Passed | Jan 2023 |
| AIP-6 | Enable fee on mainnet V3 pools | Passed | Mar 2023 |
| AIP-12 | Treasury diversification into ETH | Passed | Jun 2023 |
| AIP-20 | Uniswap V4 hook ecosystem grants | Passed | Nov 2023 |
| AIP-28 | UniswapX protocol integration | Passed | Apr 2024 |
| AIP-35 | veUNI staking model activation | Passed | Sep 2024 |
How governance shapes the protocol
Uniswap governance is intentionally slow-moving. The 48-hour forum period, 7-day vote, and 24-hour timelock give time for affected parties to respond and for the community to scrutinize technical changes. The 40M UNI quorum is high enough that passing a proposal requires genuine alignment, but low enough that apathetic token holders can still be outvoted by engaged minorities.
The Timelock controller (a 3/6 Gnosis Safe) is a known criticism: a 3/6 multisig can execute changes without full token holder consent if the signers agree, effectively making governance advisory rather than binding. Uniswap Labs (the business entity) controls 2 of the 6 keys, and the remaining 4 are held by advisors — this means Uniswap Labs can block any proposal it disagrees with, a point of concern for maximalists who want full on-chain democracy.