💵 Stablecoin Internals

Stablecoins are the backbone of DeFi — over $150B in circulation. They aim to hold a 1:1 peg to a fiat currency (usually USD), but their mechanisms vary wildly. From fully-backed USDC to the ill-fated algorithmic UST, understanding how a stablecoin maintains its peg reveals its risks. The history of DeFi is littered with broken pegs and billions lost.

📊 The Stablecoin Spectrum

Fiat-Backed
USDC, USDT — $1 in bank per token. Centralized, censurable, but battle-tested.
Crypto-Backed
DAI, LUSD — over-collateralized with ETH/crypto. Decentralized but capital-inefficient.
Algorithmic
UST (dead), FRAX (partial) — rely on arbitrage + incentives. High risk of death spiral.
Delta-Neutral
USDe (Ethena) — spot + short perp hedging. Novel, yield-bearing, carries basis risk.
✦ Live

USDC (Circle)

Fiat-backed, regulated, multi-chain — reserve composition, SVB depeg, Circle ecosystem, Arc L1 chain, and CCTP

✦ Live

USDT (Tether)

The $140B dominant stablecoin — market share, reserve controversy, regulatory history, and systemic risk

✦ Live

Ethena (USDe)

Delta-neutral yield-bearing stablecoin — funding rate capture, sUSDe staking, and risk vectors

✦ Live

Yield Comparison

Best stablecoin APYs across Aave, Compound, MakerDAO DSR, Ethena, Morpho, and more — filterable table with risk breakdown and earnings calculator

✦ Live

Stability Mechanisms

How different stablecoins maintain their peg — collateral-backed, algorithmic, and hybrid approaches

✦ Live

Depeg Dynamics

What causes stablecoins to lose their peg — confidence spirals, bank runs, and redemption pressure

✦ Live

Algorithmic Stablecoins

UST, FRAX, and the history of algorithmic stablecoin experiments — death spirals and lessons learned